NCLAT
Adjudicating Authority Empowered To Examine Entitlement Of Fee And Expenses: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Delhi, ruled that adjudicating authority is empowered to examine the entitlement of fee and expenses.

“Insofar as jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority to determine the fees and expenses, we are not agreeable with the submission of the Appellant that the Adjudicating Authority has no jurisdiction to proceed for computation of fee and expenses. When the Appellate Tribunal vide its order dated 11.12.2019 has specifically directed in paragraph 19 that Financial Creditor is liable to pay the CIRP cost and fees which was to be reported to the Adjudicating Authority and which was to be determined, the Adjudicating Authority has ample jurisdiction to proceed to examine the entitlement of the fee and expenses”, the tribunal said.

The tribunal held that the order passed by this Appellate Tribunal is final and binding between the parties and the Financial Creditor cannot escape from liability to pay fee and expenses.  

The Adjudicating Authority has determined the fee of Rs. 1,00,000/- per month totalling Rs. 7,30,000/- which the tribunal viewed that need to be paid by the Financial Creditor. CIRP expenses has also been approved for Rs. 2,41,512/- which finds approval of tribunal.

Facts 

The Adjudicating Authority took up the Company Petition and taking note of the order of the Appellate Tribunal, the Company Petition was dismissed. The Adjudicating Authority while dismissing the Company Petition observed that Financial Creditors may take note of the order of the Appellate Tribunal and invite the client’s attention to the same and ensure compliance. 

Case Information 

Case Name : Khozim Yusuf Nagarwala  v/s Satyendra Prasad Khorania Erstwhile RP of Raj Buildhome Pvt. Ltd. 

Judicial Level & Location : NCLAT, New Delhi

Appeal Number : Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 871 of 2023 & I.A. No. 2962 of 2023 

Date of Ruling : 2024-07-02

Ruling in favour of: Respondent 

Judges: Justice Ashok Bhushan Chairperson, Barun Mitra Member (Technical), Arun Baroka, Member (Technical)

Respondent Advocate: Mr. Amol Vyas, Advocate.

Click here to read the Order / Judgment

Juris Hour Team
Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You May Also Like

Central Agencies Must Conduct Themselves Within Parameters Of Law: Bombay High Court Imposes Rs. 1 lakh Cost On ED

The Bombay High Court has imposed the cost of Rs. 1 Lakhs…

CBI Arrests Income Tax Commissioner and Four Others in Hyderabad for Accepting Rs. 70 Lakh Bribe: NAMES REVEALED

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested five accused  including Jeevan Lal…

Arrest By ED Vitiated If Accused Not Produced Before Nearest Magistrate Within 24 Hours: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that the arrest by the Enforcement Directorate…

Hawala Transactions : ED Seizes Rs6.30 Crores In Torres Jewellery Case

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Mumbai Zonal Office conducted searches across Mumbai…