Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationICAI Bars CA From Bidding Without Minimum Fees for Services Reserved by...

ICAI Bars CA From Bidding Without Minimum Fees for Services Reserved by Law

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India (ICAI) has issued guidelines prohibiting practising chartered accountants from responding to tenders for professional services exclusively reserved for them under a statute unless the tender document prescribes a minimum fee.

Dated October 12, 2026, the guidelines take effect immediately. They also prohibit quoting below the minimum fee specified in an eligible tender and require practising members to maintain a cost sheet for every tender response.

The ICAI Council issued the guidelines in exercise of its powers under Section 15(2)(fa) of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The document is signed by ICAI Secretary CA. (Dr.) Jai Kumar Batra.

Buy Now: Legal & Taxation Combo – 4 Premium E-Magazines – September 2026

Minimum Fee Mandatory for Statutorily Reserved Services

The principal restriction applies to tenders seeking professional services exclusively reserved for chartered accountants under any statute. A practising member cannot respond to such a tender if it does not prescribe a minimum fee, irrespective of the name given to the tender document.

Where the tender specifies a minimum fee for the assignment, members may participate. However, the fee quoted must not fall below the amount prescribed in the tender document.

The guidelines give “minimum fee” a broad meaning. The expression includes an estimated fee, professional fee or average fee, regardless of the terminology used. Accordingly, members must examine the substance of the fee provision in the tender document when assessing whether they may respond.

The document does not prescribe a common rupee amount as a minimum fee. Instead, the participation restriction is linked to the fee specified in the relevant tender.

Extremely Low Fees Prohibited Across Tendered Services

A separate requirement applies to all tender responses, including those concerning services that are not exclusively reserved for chartered accountants.

The guidelines state that the quoted fee should not be extremely low and must be commensurate with the size, value and volume of the assignment, the manpower required and the nature of the work.

This means that permission to participate in a tender does not, by itself, permit a member to quote an inadequately supported fee. Members must assess the resources and work involved before determining their bid.

The document does not set a numerical threshold for what constitutes an “extremely low” fee. Its stated criteria focus on the characteristics and requirements of the assignment.

Cost Sheet Required for Every Tender Response

Practising members must maintain a cost sheet in every case in which they respond to a tender document.

The cost sheet must incorporate details of the estimated costs of undertaking the assignment, taking into account matters such as the number of persons involved and the hours expected to be spent.

ICAI may call for these documents from a member in relation to any bid submitted in response to a tender. The requirement therefore makes the basis of the quoted fee capable of being examined by the Institute.

For members and firms, the provision makes contemporaneous documentation of staffing, time and estimated costs an essential part of tender participation.

Different Rule for Services Not Exclusively Reserved for CAs

The guidelines expressly permit practising members to respond to tenders for services that are not exclusively reserved for chartered accountants under any statute, whether or not the tender prescribes a minimum fee.

Members may also participate in such tenders irrespective of whether only chartered accountants have been invited to respond.

The distinction consequently turns on whether a statute exclusively reserves the service for chartered accountants. A tender being addressed only to CAs does not, by itself, bring the assignment within the restriction applicable to statutorily reserved services.

Nevertheless, the requirements concerning excessively low fees and maintenance of a cost sheet continue to apply to these tender responses.

Reverse Bidding Below Minimum Fee Not Permitted

The guidelines specifically prohibit responding to a reverse bidding option below the minimum fee.

Where a tendering organisation provides a mechanism for progressively reducing bids, practising members cannot use that mechanism to quote below the prescribed minimum. The restriction therefore applies to subsequent reductions through reverse bidding as well as to the fee initially quoted.

Individual Letters Seeking Quotations Excluded

The guidelines do not apply where quotations are sought from practising members or firms through individual letters.

This exclusion is expressly tied to the manner in which the quotations are invited. The document separately directs that the new guidelines be read in conjunction with ICAI’s earlier Guideline No. 1-CA(7)/03/2016, dated April 7, 2016.

With immediate implementation, practising members responding to tenders will need to identify whether the assignment is statutorily reserved, examine the tender’s fee provisions and maintain a documented estimate of the costs underlying their bid.

Membership Required to Access Notification Details & Copy

To view the complete Notification Details and Download Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Delay In Filing Form 10AB Can’t Alone Defeat S. 80G Approval: ITAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Moulds Sent to Job Workers: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

‘Repair’ Label Can’t Deny Service Tax Exemption for Railway Construction Works: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

DRI | Customs Can’t Enhance Used Machinery Values Without Reliable Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

Commission Received After Tax Became Applicable Can’t Make Earlier Exempt Services Taxable: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has held that commission...

More like this

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Moulds Sent to Job Workers: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

‘Repair’ Label Can’t Deny Service Tax Exemption for Railway Construction Works: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...

DRI | Customs Can’t Enhance Used Machinery Values Without Reliable Evidence: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, has set aside a...