Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesPersonal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company director abated following his death. The Customs Department did not dispute the legal position before the Court.

The bench of Justice Suman Shyam and Justice Advait M. Sethna passed the order in a writ petition concerning a personal penalty imposed upon the deceased, one of the directors of the JPM Group of Companies.

Buy Now: E-Magazine: 1000+ Landmark GST Judgments (2017–2026)

The petition was filed by the petitioner against the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai. The petitioner challenged the continuation of the penalty imposed upon his father, who died on March 16, 2016.

Appearing for the petitioner, counsel submitted that the impugned penalty had been imposed personally upon Jiten P. Mody in his capacity as a director. Since he had died, the proceedings could no longer continue and had abated in law.

The petitioner relied upon the Supreme Court’s ruling in Shabina Abraham & Others v. Collector of Central Excise & Customs, reported in (2015) 10 SCC 770. Reliance was also placed on the Madras High Court decision in S. Hidayathulla @ Mannady Bharakath (Deceased) & Others v. Commissioner of Customs.

The Customs Department’s counsel did not dispute the petitioner’s submission. The Department also confirmed that the penalty proceedings had abated because the person against whom they were initiated had died.

Considering the undisputed position, the High Court declared that the proceedings initiated against the deceased in his capacity as a company director had abated. The writ petition was accordingly disposed of.

The Court’s ruling was confined to the personal penalty proceedings against the deceased director. It did not examine any separate liability of the company or other monetary claims.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

CBIC Cuts EMI Scheme Paperwork From 10 Documents to 3 to Boost MSME Participation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has substantially reduced the documentation...

PIL In Supreme Court Challenges MDR On UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000; Stay Sought On October 15 Rollout

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s...

Small Export Consignments Up To Rs. 3 Lakh Exempted From RCMC Requirement: DGFT

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has exempted low-value export consignments with a...

More like this

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

CBIC Cuts EMI Scheme Paperwork From 10 Documents to 3 to Boost MSME Participation

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has substantially reduced the documentation...

PIL In Supreme Court Challenges MDR On UPI Payments Above Rs. 2,000; Stay Sought On October 15 Rollout

A Public Interest Litigation has been filed before the Supreme Court challenging the Centre’s...