HomeColumnsITR-1 Excel Utility: Salaried Taxpayers Can Now Report 2 House Properties

ITR-1 Excel Utility: Salaried Taxpayers Can Now Report 2 House Properties

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Income Tax Department has introduced several significant changes to the ITR-1 (Sahaj) Excel utility for Assessment Year (AY) 2026-27, making the return filing process more comprehensive while expanding the scope of the simplified return form. 

The changes are particularly relevant for salaried individuals, pensioners, and taxpayers with limited sources of income who intend to file their income tax returns using ITR-1. 

The revised utility introduces new reporting requirements for taxpayers earning rental income, expands the eligibility of ITR-1 to include up to two house properties, and mandates additional documentation for claiming deductions under Section 80G.

Buy Now: INCOME TAX E-COMPILATION – JUNE 2026

ITR-1 Now Covers Two House Properties

One of the most notable changes is the expansion of ITR-1 to accommodate up to two house properties.

Previously, taxpayers owning or reporting income from a second house property generally had to switch to ITR-2, which involved comparatively detailed disclosures. Under the revised utility, eligible taxpayers can continue filing the simpler ITR-1 even if they have two house properties.

To facilitate this change, the Excel utility now includes a dedicated ‘House Property (HP)’ sheet, enabling taxpayers to separately disclose details of both properties. 

This modification is expected to benefit a large number of salaried individuals who own multiple residential properties but otherwise qualify for filing ITR-1.

Mandatory Disclosure of Co-Owners and Tenants

The revised utility also introduces enhanced disclosure requirements for taxpayers reporting rental income.

Where income from house property is disclosed, taxpayers must now provide details of:

  • Co-owners (up to seven individuals), including:
    • Name
    • PAN
    • Aadhaar Number
    • Percentage share in the property
  • Tenants (up to three tenants), including:
    • Name
    • PAN
    • Aadhaar Number

These disclosures are intended to improve transparency and assist the Income Tax Department in cross-verifying ownership and rental income declarations. 

Section 80G Claims Now Require Transaction Reference Details

The utility has also tightened compliance requirements for taxpayers claiming deductions under Section 80G for eligible charitable donations.

Apart from the existing information, taxpayers are now required to furnish:

  • Transaction Reference Number of the donation, such as:
    • UPI
    • Cheque Number
    • IMPS Reference
    • NEFT Reference
    • RTGS Reference
  • IFSC Code of the recipient bank.

These additional fields were not available in the earlier utility and are likely aimed at strengthening verification of donation claims and reducing fraudulent deductions. 

Greater Transparency in Return Filing

The latest changes indicate the Income Tax Department’s continued emphasis on collecting more granular information while retaining the convenience of simplified return filing for eligible taxpayers.

While the inclusion of two house properties broadens the utility of ITR-1, taxpayers should ensure that ownership details, tenant information, and donation-related banking particulars are readily available before filing their returns to avoid errors or processing delays.

Read More: Pre-existing Dispute Before NCLT Is a Jurisdictional Bar, Qualifies for Section 14 Limitation Benefit: Calcutta High Court

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Service Tax Payable On Spoken English Training Institute: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

KKC & SBC Refunds Can’t Be Denied on Limitation or Unjust Enrichment Grounds: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Customs Dept Failed to Prove Alleged KYC Lapses by Customs Broker: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept. Appeal

The Delhi High Court has dismissed the Customs Department's appeal holding that the department...

Goods Transport Charges Can’t Be Clubbed with C&F Services for Service Tax: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

More like this

Service Tax Payable On Spoken English Training Institute: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

KKC & SBC Refunds Can’t Be Denied on Limitation or Unjust Enrichment Grounds: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Customs Dept Failed to Prove Alleged KYC Lapses by Customs Broker: Delhi High Court Dismisses Dept. Appeal

The Delhi High Court has dismissed the Customs Department's appeal holding that the department...