HomeGSTGST Demand Seeking Retrospective 28% Tax Rate on Fruit Juice-Based Drinks Stayed:...

GST Demand Seeking Retrospective 28% Tax Rate on Fruit Juice-Based Drinks Stayed: Karnataka High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court stayed the operation of an adjudication order that sought to levy Goods and Services Tax (GST) at the rate of 28% retrospectively on fruit juice-based beverages for the period from April 2021 to September 2021. 

The bench of Justice B.M. Shyam Prasad observed that the matter requires consideration and granted interim protection to the petitioner pending final adjudication.

The writ petition was filed challenging an adjudication order dated December 20, 2025 issued under Section 73(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.

The dispute centres on the applicable GST rate for beverages supplied during the period between April 2021 and September 2021.

According to the tax department, the petitioner ought to have discharged GST at the rate of 28% even during this six-month period, despite the fact that Notification No. 8/2021, which prescribed the higher rate, was issued only on September 30, 2021 and expressly stated that it would come into force from October 1, 2021.

The adjudication order proceeded on the basis that the revised tax classification applied even to transactions undertaken prior to the notification becoming effective, thereby raising a substantial tax demand.

Buy Now: GST Judgements E-Compilation – May 2026

Appearing for the petitioner, counsel Raghavendra B. Hanjer argued that the notification clearly specifies its effective date as October 1, 2021 and therefore cannot be applied retrospectively.

The petitioner submitted that for the period up to September 2021, GST had been discharged at the rate of 12% in accordance with the notification that was then in force. It was further argued that the applicable notification during the relevant period did not distinguish between fruit pulp or fruit juice-based drinks and carbonated fruit drinks or fruit juice-based beverages. Consequently, there was no legal basis to demand GST at the enhanced rate of 28% for transactions undertaken before October 1, 2021.

The petitioner also informed the Court that it has been paying GST at the rate of 28% after the new notification came into force on October 1, 2021.

After considering the submissions and examining the records, the Karnataka High Court granted an interim order staying the effect of the adjudication order until further orders.

At the same time, the Court granted liberty to the respondents to complete their pleadings and seek vacation of the interim order or request early disposal of the writ petition. The Additional Government Advocate accepted notice on behalf of the respondents.

The High Court has directed that the writ petition be listed for further hearing on August 18, 2026, when the State is expected to file its response and the legality of the retrospective tax demand will be examined in greater detail.

Membership Required to Access Case Details & Order Copy

To view the complete Case Details and Download Order Copy, you must have an active membership. Please subscribe to continue.

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Read More: Calcutta High Court Quashes Rs. 87.20 Crore Income Tax Assessment Against PwC Over Denial of Fair Hearing

Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari
Nikhil Bhandari is a Chartered Accountant and a Indirect Tax professional with over 4.5 years of post-qualification experience in tax advisory, compliance management, and tax process optimization. Associated with SDU LLP since August 2015 spanning his articleship through to his current role as Assistant Manager Nikhil has uniquely navigated India’s transition from the legacy tax regime into the GST era.His expertise encompasses both strategic advisory and Indirect Tax litigation, where he represents clients in complex disputes across the manufacturing, service, and e-commerce sectors. By providing high-level counsel to corporate leadership, he ensures that tax positions are not only robust and compliant but also structured for long-term operational efficiency.Beyond his core practice, Nikhil is a proactive contributor to the GST ecosystem. He is dedicated to tracking and analyzing judicial precedents from various High Courts and the Supreme Court, fostering greater clarity and ease of access to tax intelligence for the wider professional community.

Latest articles

Madras High Court Quashes 2 Overlapping GST Assessment Orders Passed For Same Period

The Madras High Court has set aside two overlapping GST assessment orders passed for...

Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand and Bank Attachment After LLP Agrees to Deposit 25% Tax Demand

The Madras High Court has set aside GST demand orders and the consequential recovery...

GST SCN Issued After Repeated Audit Proceedings Stayed; Karnataka High Court Questions Jurisdiction of Fresh Action

The Karnataka High Court has stayed further proceedings pursuant to multiple show cause notices...

GST Demand Stayed on Interest-Free Loan Between Company and Managing Director: Karnataka High Court 

The Karnataka High Court has stayed further proceedings arising out of a GST adjudication...

More like this

Madras High Court Quashes 2 Overlapping GST Assessment Orders Passed For Same Period

The Madras High Court has set aside two overlapping GST assessment orders passed for...

Madras High Court Quashes GST Demand and Bank Attachment After LLP Agrees to Deposit 25% Tax Demand

The Madras High Court has set aside GST demand orders and the consequential recovery...

GST SCN Issued After Repeated Audit Proceedings Stayed; Karnataka High Court Questions Jurisdiction of Fresh Action

The Karnataka High Court has stayed further proceedings pursuant to multiple show cause notices...