Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesOne-Time Water Infrastructure Charges on Long-Term Industrial Leases Not Taxable as Support...

One-Time Water Infrastructure Charges on Long-Term Industrial Leases Not Taxable as Support Services: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
One-Time Water Infrastructure Charges on Long-Term Industrial Leases Not Taxable as Support Services: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has set aside a service tax demand raised against State Industries Promotion Corporation of Tamil Nadu Ltd. (SIPCOT), ruling that the one-time amount collected from industrial allottees towards water supply infrastructure qualifies for exemption under Section 104 of the Finance Act, 1994. …

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Supreme Court

Loan Advanced Against Promissory Note By Unlicensed Money Lender Doesn’t Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt U/s 138 Of NI Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an interest-bearing loan advanced against a promissory note...
GST

E-Invoice Portal Glitch Can’t Justify 200% GST Penalty Without Intent To Evade Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a 200%...
Supreme Court

Legislature Can’t Revive Recruitment Cancelled For Corruption: Supreme Court Strikes Down Karnataka Law

The Supreme Court has struck down the Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and...
GST

No Pre-Deposit For GST Interest-Only Appeal When Tax Is Fully Paid: Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Notices

The Bombay High Court has held that the percentage-based pre-deposit required for filing an...

More like this

Supreme Court

Loan Advanced Against Promissory Note By Unlicensed Money Lender Doesn’t Constitute Legally Enforceable Debt U/s 138 Of NI Act: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has held that an interest-bearing loan advanced against a promissory note...
GST

E-Invoice Portal Glitch Can’t Justify 200% GST Penalty Without Intent To Evade Tax: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has set aside a 200%...
Supreme Court

Legislature Can’t Revive Recruitment Cancelled For Corruption: Supreme Court Strikes Down Karnataka Law

The Supreme Court has struck down the Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and...