Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It...

Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT 

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Dept. Can’t Classify Product as Zarda Scented Tobacco After Repeatedly Approving It As Chewing Tobacco: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside a central excise duty demand, interest, and penalties imposed on Rajasthan-based tobacco manufacturer holding that the department could not alter the classification of the product after consistently treating it as “chewing tobacco” for several years. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST ITC Can’t Be Blocked U/R 86A Without Giving Taxpayer an Opportunity: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that a decision to block Input Tax Credit...
GST

Rs. 50K Cost Imposed On Tax Officer For Passing GST Order Before Expiry of 60-Day Voluntary Payment Window: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has quashed a GST demand and penalty order after finding...
Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 4 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 4, 2026.GSTPACKING MATERIALS ARE ‘INPUTS’ FOR...
GST

Cash Refund Loses Its Character as Tax or Interest; 10% Pre-Deposit Required for GST Appeal: GSTAT Registry

The GST Appellate Tribunal’s Hyderabad Registry has opined that an amount received by a...

More like this

GST

GST ITC Can’t Be Blocked U/R 86A Without Giving Taxpayer an Opportunity: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that a decision to block Input Tax Credit...
GST

Rs. 50K Cost Imposed On Tax Officer For Passing GST Order Before Expiry of 60-Day Voluntary Payment Window: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has quashed a GST demand and penalty order after finding...
Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 4 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 4, 2026.GSTPACKING MATERIALS ARE ‘INPUTS’ FOR...