Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeColumnsCJI Surya Kant Clarifies ‘Cockroach’ Remark, Says Comments Were Against Fake Degree...

CJI Surya Kant Clarifies ‘Cockroach’ Remark, Says Comments Were Against Fake Degree Holders

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

Chief Justice of India Surya Kant on Saturday issued a sharp clarification over his controversial courtroom remarks that sparked widespread debate, asserting that his observations were wrongly interpreted as criticism of the country’s youth.

In a statement released a day after the remarks triggered backlash, the Chief Justice said he was “deeply pained” by media reports that allegedly distorted the context of his oral observations made during the hearing of a plea related to senior advocate designation.

“I am pained to read how a section of the media has misquoted my oral observations made during the hearing of a frivolous case yesterday,” he said.

Justice Kant clarified that his comments were specifically aimed at individuals who allegedly enter professions such as law using “fake and bogus degrees,” and not at young people in general.

“What I had criticised were those who have entered professions like the Bar with the aid of fake and bogus degrees. Similar persons have infiltrated the media, social media and other noble professions as well, and hence, they are like parasites,” the CJI stated.

The controversy arose during Friday’s court proceedings when the Chief Justice, while questioning a lawyer over a plea seeking senior designation, reportedly used expressions such as “parasites” and “cockroaches.” The remarks quickly drew attention on social media and in sections of the press, with some reports suggesting they were directed at the younger generation.

Rejecting that interpretation, Justice Kant said the suggestion that he had criticised India’s youth was “completely baseless.”

“Not only am I proud of our present and future human resource, but every youth of India inspires me,” he said, adding that young Indians remain the foundation of the country’s future growth and development.

“It is not an exaggeration to say that Indian youth have great regard and respect for me, and I too see them as the pillars of a developed India,” he added.

The clarification comes amid growing scrutiny over oral courtroom remarks and the manner in which they are reported and circulated in the public domain.

Read More: DGFT Office Memorandum Can’t Retrospectively Invalidate Valid PSIC; No Misdeclaration in UAE Scrap Imports: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Income Tax Penalty Invalid If Notice Fails To Specify Under-Reporting Or Misreporting Charge: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a penalty...

Rs. 11.56 Crore GST ITC Fraud Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As Investigation Is Complete

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to the authorised signatory...

10% Stamp Duty Valuation Tolerance Applies To AY 2018-19: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

IBC Appeal Filed Without Delay-Condonation Plea Cannot Escape 45-Day Limit: NCLAT Dismisses ED’s Appeal

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi, has dismissed an...

More like this

Income Tax Penalty Invalid If Notice Fails To Specify Under-Reporting Or Misreporting Charge: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a penalty...

Rs. 11.56 Crore GST ITC Fraud Case: Punjab & Haryana High Court Grants Bail As Investigation Is Complete

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to the authorised signatory...

10% Stamp Duty Valuation Tolerance Applies To AY 2018-19: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...