Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesDGFT Office Memorandum Can’t Retrospectively Invalidate Valid PSIC; No Misdeclaration in UAE...

DGFT Office Memorandum Can’t Retrospectively Invalidate Valid PSIC; No Misdeclaration in UAE Scrap Imports: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
DGFT Office Memorandum Can’t Retrospectively Invalidate Valid PSIC; No Misdeclaration in UAE Scrap Imports: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that a valid Pre-Shipment Inspection Certificate (PSIC) cannot be retrospectively invalidated through a Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) Office Memorandum, while setting aside confiscation, redemption fine and penalty imposed on an importer of ferrous scrap.  The bench of S….

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 8 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 8, 2026.GSTDEPARTMENTAL CIRCULAR CAN’T BE USED...
GST

GST ITC Dispute Involving Interpretation of S. 16 and 18 Must Be Heard by Division Bench: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...
GST

DGGI Gawahati | GST Bank Account Attachment Automatically Lapses After 1 Year: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section...
GST

S. 74 GST Can’t Be Invoked to Question CENVAT Credit Availed Under Pre-GST Regime: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has held that GST authorities cannot invoke Section...

More like this

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 8 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 8, 2026.GSTDEPARTMENTAL CIRCULAR CAN’T BE USED...
GST

GST ITC Dispute Involving Interpretation of S. 16 and 18 Must Be Heard by Division Bench: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...
GST

DGGI Gawahati | GST Bank Account Attachment Automatically Lapses After 1 Year: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has held that provisional attachment of bank accounts under Section...