HomeSupreme CourtNo Advocates-on-Record Examination in 2026: Supreme Court Defers Test Citing Adequate AOR...

No Advocates-on-Record Examination in 2026: Supreme Court Defers Test Citing Adequate AOR Strength

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court of India has announced that the Advocates-on-Record (AOR) Examination will not be conducted in the year 2026. The decision has been taken by the Competent Authority of the Court, keeping in view the current overall strength of Advocates-on-Record.

As per the official communication dated April 30, 2026, issued by the Advocates-on-Record Examination Cell, the Court has assessed that the existing number of AORs is sufficient, thereby obviating the need to hold the examination this year. The AOR examination is a crucial gateway for advocates seeking the exclusive right to file and act on behalf of parties before the Supreme Court.

The notification further clarifies that the next AOR Examination is likely to be conducted in the year 2027. However, the exact schedule and dates for the examination will be notified in due course. This effectively means that aspirants will have to wait an additional year for the opportunity to qualify as Advocates-on-Record.

The communication has been formally issued under the authority of the Registrar (Judicial) and Secretary to the Board of Examiners for the AOR Examination. Copies of the notification have also been circulated to the Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) and the Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association (SCAORA), among others.

The decision is expected to have a direct impact on advocates preparing for the examination, as it alters the usual annual cycle of the AOR test. At the same time, it reflects the Court’s administrative assessment of maintaining a balanced and adequate pool of qualified Advocates-on-Record for effective functioning.

Read More: IBC Remedy Must Be Exhausted; Approach NCLAT: Supreme Court Declines Interference in CIRP Withdrawal Dispute

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Proforma Invoice Valid for Availing CENVAT Credit if Service Tax Is Paid: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Tax Demand Can’t Be Raised Through Computation Sheet When Assessment Accepts Returned Income Without Additions: ITAT

The Bengaluru Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

Import Duty Payable on Actual Reduced Price Despite Higher Price at Time of Import: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Driver’s Statement on Plain Paper Has ‘Very Little Evidentiary Value’: Allahabad High Court Quashes GST Penalty Order 

The Allahabad High Court has set aside an appellate order upholding a penalty under...

More like this

Proforma Invoice Valid for Availing CENVAT Credit if Service Tax Is Paid: CESTAT

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Tax Demand Can’t Be Raised Through Computation Sheet When Assessment Accepts Returned Income Without Additions: ITAT

The Bengaluru Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that the...

Import Duty Payable on Actual Reduced Price Despite Higher Price at Time of Import: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...