Strict Approach on Condonation: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal of Titagarh Wagons Over 810-Day Delay

HomeDirect TaxStrict Approach on Condonation: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal of...

Strict Approach on Condonation: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal of Titagarh Wagons Over 810-Day Delay

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

27/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Strict Approach on Condonation: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal of Titagarh Wagons Over 810-Day Delay

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court dismissed an income tax appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against Titagarh Wagons Ltd. due to an unexplained delay of 810 days in filing the appeal. The bench of Justice Rajarshi Bharadwaj and Justice Uday Kumar has observed government authorities must adhere to the same standards as private…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Income Tax Appeal

Strict Approach on Condonation: Calcutta High Court Dismisses Income Tax Appeal of Titagarh Wagons Over 810-Day Delay

Membership Required

Latest articles

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Prosthetic Limbs in Motor Accident Cases; Enhances Award to ₹36.20 Lakh

Cause of Action Must Be Judged Without Conducting Mini-Trial Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of Plaint Order

No “Make Available” of Technical Knowledge: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Taxability of Receipts Under India–US DTAA

Arvind Kejriwal Writes to Delhi High Court, Cites “Inability in Conscience” to Continue Proceedings

More like this

Supreme Court Clarifies Compensation for Prosthetic Limbs in Motor Accident Cases; Enhances Award to ₹36.20 Lakh

Cause of Action Must Be Judged Without Conducting Mini-Trial Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC: Supreme Court Quashes Rejection of Plaint Order

No “Make Available” of Technical Knowledge: Supreme Court Upholds Non-Taxability of Receipts Under India–US DTAA

About us

Company

Categories