Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesVoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62...

VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
VoIP Phones with Video & Data Capabilities Classifiable under CTH 8517 62 90; IBM India Denied Customs Exemption: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that advanced VoIP phones capable of transmitting voice, video, and data are not mere telephone sets but fall under the category of data transmission apparatus.  The bench Dr. D.M. Misra (Judicial Member) and R. Bhagya Devi (Technical Member) upheld the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Share Loss Set-Off Against Slump Sale Gains Can’t Alone Trigger GAAR: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has set aside directions invoking the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR)...
GST

GST Appeal Limitation Depends On Communication Of Order, Mere Portal Upload Not Enough: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order rejecting a GST appeal as...
Direct Tax

High School Fees And Surplus Alone Can’t Justify Denial Of Charitable Tax Registration: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad, has held that charging substantial school fees...
GST

DGGI Can’t Freeze Payment Aggregator’s Escrow Funds on Mere Suspicion : Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has quashed provisional attachments of the bank accounts of an...

More like this

Direct Tax

Share Loss Set-Off Against Slump Sale Gains Can’t Alone Trigger GAAR: Telangana High Court

The Telangana High Court has set aside directions invoking the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR)...
GST

GST Appeal Limitation Depends On Communication Of Order, Mere Portal Upload Not Enough: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has set aside an order rejecting a GST appeal as...
Direct Tax

High School Fees And Surplus Alone Can’t Justify Denial Of Charitable Tax Registration: ITAT

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Hyderabad, has held that charging substantial school fees...