HomeGSTCut Tobacco Not ‘Manufactured Chewing Tobacco’, Not Covered Under Higher Tax Category:...

Cut Tobacco Not ‘Manufactured Chewing Tobacco’, Not Covered Under Higher Tax Category: Madras HC 

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Madras High Court has held that cut tobacco produced through minimal processing would not automatically qualify as “manufactured chewing tobacco,” setting aside advance ruling orders that had classified the product under a higher tax category. The Division Bench comprising Justice G.R. Swaminathan and Justice K. Rajasekar allowed a writ appeal filed by a tobacco…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...

Statements Without S. 9D Procedure Not Admissible: CESTAT Quashes Rs. 4.12 Cr CENVAT Credit Demand

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi Principal Bench, has...

More like this

ITC Refund Limitation Must Be Counted Based on Nature of Supply, Not Mechanical Application of S. 54: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has clarified the correct interpretation of limitation under Section 54...

CUSTOMS ACT | Nominal Shortfall in Penalty Can’t Deny Amnesty Benefit Under Customs Law: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench, has held that a...

Insurance, Hedging & Employee Training Services Qualify as Input Services: CESTAT Allows Cenvat Credit

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has held that...