The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata has set aside a massive excise duty demand of over ₹16.54 crore holding that allegations of clandestine manufacture and removal cannot be sustained merely on the basis of differences between VAT returns and ER-1 returns, in the absence of corroborative evidence. The Bench of Ashok…
Excise Demand Can’t Be Based Solely on VAT vs ER-1 Mismatch: CESTAT
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
- Tags
- Excise Demand
Latest articles
Supreme Court
Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...
GST
GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere
The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...
GST
Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...
Indirect Taxes
Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT
The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...
More like this
Supreme Court
Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with the Delhi High Court's judgment holding...
GST
GST Proceedings Against Firm for Availing ITC from Cancelled Dealers: Supreme Court Refuses To Interfere
The Supreme Court has declined to interfere with the Punjab and Haryana High Court's...
GST
Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...

