Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesEXCISE DUTY | 10% Penalty Valid U/s 25 Despite Interpretational Dispute And...

EXCISE DUTY | 10% Penalty Valid U/s 25 Despite Interpretational Dispute And Not Fraud: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
cestat

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench, has upheld the imposition of penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, even in the absence of fraud, suppression, or wilful misstatement, in a significant ruling involving Little Star Foods Pvt Ltd. The bench of Angad Prasad  (Judicial Member) and A.K. Jyotishi…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Rs. 8.12 Crore VAT–Income Tax Turnover Mismatch Justifies Reopening Beyond Four Years: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the reopening of Pernod Ricard India Private Limited’s...
Indirect Taxes

Gold Worth Rs. 35.21 Lakh Hidden in Trolley Bag Linings Seized at Delhi Airport

Delhi Customs officers foiled a gold smuggling attempt at Indira Gandhi International Airport after...
GST

Proof Of Tax Evasion Not Required For Expired E-Way Bill Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur, has held that the department...
GST

Payment To Release Goods Doesn’t Waive Right To Challenge GST Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur Bench, has held that payment...

More like this

Direct Tax

Rs. 8.12 Crore VAT–Income Tax Turnover Mismatch Justifies Reopening Beyond Four Years: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has upheld the reopening of Pernod Ricard India Private Limited’s...
Indirect Taxes

Gold Worth Rs. 35.21 Lakh Hidden in Trolley Bag Linings Seized at Delhi Airport

Delhi Customs officers foiled a gold smuggling attempt at Indira Gandhi International Airport after...
GST

Proof Of Tax Evasion Not Required For Expired E-Way Bill Penalty: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Raipur, has held that the department...