HomeIndirect TaxesDelay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even...

Delay Beyond Prescribed Condonable Period Can’t Be Entertained By Appellate Authorities, Even In Interest Claims On Rebate: Bombay High Court

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has reiterated the strict statutory limitation framework under Section 35 of the Central Excise Act, 1944, holding that delay beyond the prescribed condonable period cannot be entertained by appellate authorities, even in cases involving claims of interest on rebate. The bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe found…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

SAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions Are Met: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Value of Bought-Out Items Not Includable in Assessable Value: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

CESTAT Quashes Bank Guarantee Condition for Provisional Release of Areca Nuts, Calls It Arbitrary and Unreasonable

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Recovered Again If Duty Paid on Final Product Exceeds Credit Availed: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench has dismissed the...

More like this

SAD Refund Can’t Be Denied for Invoice Format Differences When Substantive Conditions Are Met: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

Value of Bought-Out Items Not Includable in Assessable Value: CESTAT 

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...

CESTAT Quashes Bank Guarantee Condition for Provisional Release of Areca Nuts, Calls It Arbitrary and Unreasonable

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has held that...