Bombay HC Directs Filing of CA-Certified Affidavit to Prove No Unjust Enrichment in Tax Dispute Involving Flat Buyers

HomeDirect TaxBombay HC Directs Filing of CA-Certified Affidavit to Prove No Unjust Enrichment...

Bombay HC Directs Filing of CA-Certified Affidavit to Prove No Unjust Enrichment in Tax Dispute Involving Flat Buyers

Direct Tax

Published on

13/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Bombay HC Directs Filing of CA-Certified Affidavit to Prove No Unjust Enrichment in Tax Dispute Involving Flat Buyers

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has directed the petitioner to substantiate its claim that no tax burden was passed on to customers in transactions involving flat purchasers, by filing a Chartered Accountant (CA)-certified affidavit. The Bench of Justice G. S. Kulkarni and Justice Aarti Sathe has observed in its earlier order dated April 1, 2026, certain…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Bombay HC Directs Filing of CA-Certified Affidavit to Prove No Unjust Enrichment in Tax Dispute Involving Flat Buyers

Membership Required

Latest articles

Input Service Benefits Can’t Be Denied: CESTAT Allows Export Refund Despite MMTC Acting as Canalising Agency

Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 2.97 Crore E-Cigarette Smuggling Case

Mere ‘Wrong Statements’ in Court Pleadings Can’t Trigger Perjury Prosecution: Supreme Court

Murder Cases by Juveniles Above 16 Are ‘Heinous Offences’: Supreme Court

More like this

Input Service Benefits Can’t Be Denied: CESTAT Allows Export Refund Despite MMTC Acting as Canalising Agency

Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 2.97 Crore E-Cigarette Smuggling Case

Mere ‘Wrong Statements’ in Court Pleadings Can’t Trigger Perjury Prosecution: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories