Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesService Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third...

Service Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third Party Acting On Behalf Of Main Contractor: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Service Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third Party Acting On Behalf Of Main Contractor: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench, has held that service tax exemption cannot be denied merely because payment for services was received from a third party acting on behalf of the main contractor. The bench Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Customs Can’t Replace Declared CIF Value With FOB Figure in Non-GMO Certificate Without Proof of Extra Payment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has ruled that Customs...
Indirect Taxes

Supplier’s Wrong Shipment Can’t Be Treated as Importer’s Customs Misdeclaration: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Quarterly Export Refund Limitation Runs From End of Quarter in Which FIRC Is Received: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has held that the...
Indirect Taxes

DGFT’s Export Obligation Discharge Certificate Bars Customs Demand Over EPCG Car Import: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has set aside customs...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Customs Can’t Replace Declared CIF Value With FOB Figure in Non-GMO Certificate Without Proof of Extra Payment: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has ruled that Customs...
Indirect Taxes

Supplier’s Wrong Shipment Can’t Be Treated as Importer’s Customs Misdeclaration: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Quarterly Export Refund Limitation Runs From End of Quarter in Which FIRC Is Received: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Mumbai, has held that the...