Service Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third Party Acting On Behalf Of Main Contractor: CESTAT

HomeIndirect TaxesService Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third...

Service Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third Party Acting On Behalf Of Main Contractor: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

07/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Service Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third Party Acting On Behalf Of Main Contractor: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi Bench, has held that service tax exemption cannot be denied merely because payment for services was received from a third party acting on behalf of the main contractor. The bench Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that the…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Service Tax Exemption

Service Tax Exemption Can’t Be Denied Merely For Payment Received From Third Party Acting On Behalf Of Main Contractor: CESTAT

Membership Required

Latest articles

ED Complaint Seeks PMLA and GST Probe into Alleged Shell Companies, Cancelled GST Registration and Diversion of Investor Funds by Suiidhaaga Entities

DGGI | Habeas Corpus Petition Maintainable Where Remand Order Itself Suffered From Serious Legal Infirmities: Allahabad High Court

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

Movement of Goods to Depots for Inventory Replenishment Can’t Be Treated as Inter-State Sale: CESTAT

More like this

ED Complaint Seeks PMLA and GST Probe into Alleged Shell Companies, Cancelled GST Registration and Diversion of Investor Funds by Suiidhaaga Entities

DGGI | Habeas Corpus Petition Maintainable Where Remand Order Itself Suffered From Serious Legal Infirmities: Allahabad High Court

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 22 May, 2026

About us

Company

Categories