CESTAT Dismisses Multiple Customs Appeals Over Monetary Threshold Limit

HomeIndirect TaxesCESTAT Dismisses Multiple Customs Appeals Over Monetary Threshold Limit

CESTAT Dismisses Multiple Customs Appeals Over Monetary Threshold Limit

Indirect Taxes Top Stories

Published on

04/04/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

CESTAT Dismisses Multiple Customs Appeals Over Monetary Threshold Limit

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Principal Bench in New Delhi, has dismissed a series of appeals filed by the customs department concerning penalties in gold-related cases citing monetary threshold limit. The bench of S.K. Mohanty (Judicial Member) has observed that as per the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC)…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Monetary Threshold

CESTAT Dismisses Multiple Customs Appeals Over Monetary Threshold Limit

Membership Required

Latest articles

Daughters’ Partition Suit Can’t Be Rejected at Threshold; S. 6(5) of Hindu Succession Act Is Only a Saving Clause, Not a Bar: Supreme Court

India’s Gold Demand May Fall 10% in 2026 After Sharp Duty Hike

Can S. 122(1A) Be Invoked Against Individual Not Retaining Benefit of Transaction? Bombay HC Stays Recovery of Penalty on Director

Whether ‘3 Months’ U/s 73(10) of CGST Act Means Exactly 3 Calendar Months or 90 Days? SC Issues Notice

More like this

Daughters’ Partition Suit Can’t Be Rejected at Threshold; S. 6(5) of Hindu Succession Act Is Only a Saving Clause, Not a Bar: Supreme Court

India’s Gold Demand May Fall 10% in 2026 After Sharp Duty Hike

Can S. 122(1A) Be Invoked Against Individual Not Retaining Benefit of Transaction? Bombay HC Stays Recovery of Penalty on Director

About us

Company

Categories