Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesMere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By...

Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence of Service: CESTAT 

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Mere Issuance Of Order Doesn’t Amount To Valid Communication Unless Supported By Evidence: CESTAT 

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bangalore Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has remanded a dispute involving service tax refund claims, emphasizing that mere issuance of an order does not amount to valid communication unless supported by evidence. The bench of Dr. D.M. Misra (Judicial Member) has observed that the Department failed to produce…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Direct Tax

Actuarially Determined Provision for Credit Guarantee Claims Is Allowable Deduction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...
Direct Tax

CBDT’s Revised Rs. 2 Crore Tax-Appeal Limit Applies to Pending Cases; Later Exceptions Can’t Operate Retrospectively: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has disposed of an Income Tax Department appeal involving a...
Direct Tax

Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Requires PCCIT Sanction: ITAT Quashes Notice Approved by CIT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...
Direct Tax

Stamp Duty Value Must Be Determined on Property Allotment Date If Part-Payment Made Through Banking Channel: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has deleted an addition...

More like this

Direct Tax

Actuarially Determined Provision for Credit Guarantee Claims Is Allowable Deduction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...
Direct Tax

CBDT’s Revised Rs. 2 Crore Tax-Appeal Limit Applies to Pending Cases; Later Exceptions Can’t Operate Retrospectively: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has disposed of an Income Tax Department appeal involving a...
Direct Tax

Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Requires PCCIT Sanction: ITAT Quashes Notice Approved by CIT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...