Challenge to GSTIN Merger Not Fit for Appeal; Directs Review Before Single Judge: Allahabad High Court

HomeGSTChallenge to GSTIN Merger Not Fit for Appeal; Directs Review Before Single...

Challenge to GSTIN Merger Not Fit for Appeal; Directs Review Before Single Judge: Allahabad High Court

GST Top Stories

Published on

29/03/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court has held that the challenge to the Goods and Service Tax Identification Number (GSTIN) merger is not fit for appeal and directed review before a single judge. The Bench of Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra has observed that once the appellant seeks to raise plea regarding maintainability of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GSTIN Merger

Challenge to GSTIN Merger Not Fit for Appeal; Directs Review Before Single Judge: Allahabad High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

ITC Relief to Bona Fide Buyers: S. 16(2)(c) and R. 36(4) Read Down to Allow ITC To Bonafide Recipients from Supplier Default: Karnataka HC

PMLA Bail Denied Over ‘Speedy Trial’ Claim: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules Custody Not Long Enough to Override S. 45 Twin Conditions

PMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High Court Answers

COVID-19 Limitation Extension: Uttarakhand High Court Holds 90-Day Benefit Applies Uniformly

More like this

ITC Relief to Bona Fide Buyers: S. 16(2)(c) and R. 36(4) Read Down to Allow ITC To Bonafide Recipients from Supplier Default: Karnataka HC

PMLA Bail Denied Over ‘Speedy Trial’ Claim: Punjab & Haryana High Court Rules Custody Not Long Enough to Override S. 45 Twin Conditions

PMLA Attachment | Is Timing of Property Purchase Crucial Factor? Gauhati High Court Answers

About us

Company

Categories