Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMeerut DGGI | Court Grants 14-Day Remand in Fraudulent ITC Availment Case

Meerut DGGI | Court Grants 14-Day Remand in Fraudulent ITC Availment Case

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

A Special Chief Judicial Magistrate court in Meerut has granted a 14-day judicial remand to an accused, Mohammad Aaqib allegedly involved in fraudulent Input Tax Credit (ITC) claims amounting to hundreds of crores.

The matter was investigated by the Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI), Meerut.

The accused, identified as Mohammad Aaqib, was arrested on March 25, 2026, at approximately 7:40 AM. The prosecution alleged that the accused fraudulently availed ITC worth ₹276.16 crore by creating multiple fake firms using forged documents. It was further alleged that he, along with associates, passed on ineligible ITC through these entities.

Investigators also claimed that the accused fraudulently obtained GST refunds worth Rs. 18.22 crore through three firms. Additionally, Rs. 4.77 crore was allegedly transferred to his personal firm’s bank account. The total alleged tax evasion in the case is stated to exceed ₹294 crore, categorizing it as a serious economic offence.

During the hearing, the defense counsel argued that there was no concrete evidence supporting the allegation of Rs. 276.16 crore ITC fraud and sought dismissal of the remand application. However, after hearing both sides and examining the records, the court found sufficient material indicating the accused’s involvement in the creation of shell firms and fraudulent transactions.

The court also noted that all procedural safeguards were followed at the time of arrest, including preparation of arrest memo, seizure reports, and informing the accused’s relatives.

Taking into account the gravity of the offence and the scale of the alleged fraud, the court allowed the remand application and ordered that the accused be sent to judicial custody for 14 days. He has been directed to be produced before the court again on April 6, 2026.

The GST Department was represented by SPP Lakshay Kumar Singh.

Read More: DRI Fails to Secure Bail Cancellation In Italian Furniture Customs Duty Evasion Case

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...

Adjudicating Authority Ignored Remand Directions, Reissued ‘Copy-Paste’ Order: CESTAT Quashes Service Tax Demand 

The Allahabad Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

DGFT To Launch Central Processing Dept. for Faceless, Jurisdiction-Free Trade Applications By 2 October 2026

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) is establishing a Central Processing Department (CPD)...

Undisclosed Receipts in ST-3 Return Justify Extended Service Tax Demand: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a service tax...

Importer’s Consent to Enhanced Customs Value Doesn’t Bar Appeal; Valuation Must Follow Statutory Procedure: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Allahabad Bench, has held that...