The Delhi Bench of Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that excess service tax paid inadvertently cannot be subjected to the limitation period prescribed under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) has observed that any…
Limitation Not Applicable for Excess Service Tax Paid by Mistake: CESTAT
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.
Latest articles
Notification
Centre Extends Customs Duty Concessions for Electronics Manufacturing Machinery Till March 2029
The Central Government has expanded customs duty concessions for machinery, equipment, and critical components...
Direct Tax
ITAT Upholds ₹11.45 Lakh Addition After Assessee Fails to Explain Seized Cash
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld an addition...
Direct Tax
BARC Share Subscription Was Not a Prohibited Investment: ITAT Upholds S. 11 Exemption
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...
Direct Tax
Genuine Loans Can’t Be Taxed as Unexplained Cash Credits: ITAT
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the deletion...
More like this
Notification
Centre Extends Customs Duty Concessions for Electronics Manufacturing Machinery Till March 2029
The Central Government has expanded customs duty concessions for machinery, equipment, and critical components...
Direct Tax
ITAT Upholds ₹11.45 Lakh Addition After Assessee Fails to Explain Seized Cash
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld an addition...
Direct Tax
BARC Share Subscription Was Not a Prohibited Investment: ITAT Upholds S. 11 Exemption
The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...

