Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTCGST Delhi South Commissionerate Arrests Smartphone Trader’s Director in Rs. 60.59 Crore...

CGST Delhi South Commissionerate Arrests Smartphone Trader’s Director in Rs. 60.59 Crore Fake ITC Fraud

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Anti-Evasion Branch of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST), Delhi South Commissionerate, has arrested a director of a private limited company involved in trading smartphones for allegedly availing fake ITC worth Rs. 60.59 crore using bogus invoices amounting to Rs. 397.23 crore.

According to officials, the fraudulent availment of ITC constitutes a violation of Section 16 of the CGST Act, 2017 and attracts penal provisions under Section 132 of the Act.

The investigation began after a detailed analysis of GST return data raised suspicion regarding the transactions reported by the company. Subsequent verification of the supplier entity’s declared place of business revealed that the premises was merely a co-working space. Authorities found no books of accounts, stock, invoices, or any other records indicating genuine business activity at the location.

During questioning, the director failed to provide a satisfactory explanation regarding the functioning of the firm or the payment mechanism for the purported transactions. Investigators also could not establish any verifiable payment trail corresponding to the alleged supply of goods. Officials believe that the transactions were non-genuine and were carried out only on paper to facilitate fraudulent passing and utilization of ITC.

Authorities stated that the arrested director was the direct beneficiary of the alleged tax evasion. The offence falls under Section 132(1)(c) and is punishable under Section 132(1)(i) of the CGST Act, 2017.

Following the arrest, the accused was produced before the Duty Magistrate, who remanded him to judicial custody for 14 days.

Officials also highlighted that the CGST Delhi South Commissionerate has intensified enforcement actions during the current financial year and has already launched prosecutions against 45 individuals involved in tax fraud under the CGST Act, 2017.

Read More: Call Centre Services Provided to Foreign Client Qualify as Export: CESTAT

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...

S. 106 Can’t Replace Proof of Guilt: Supreme Court Acquits Man in Kidnapping-Murder Case, Calls Investigation ‘Shoddy’

The Supreme Court has acquitted a man convicted in a kidnapping and murder case...

More like this

ITO Cuts Rs. 1.42 Lakh Income Tax Demand to Rs. 671 Despite S. 154 Time-Limit Objection [READ ORDER]

In a significant taxpayer-relief case, the Income Tax Department has reduced a demand of...

Bombay High Court Quashes Rs. 20.16 Crore TP Adjustment as Mandatory SCN Was Not Served

The Bombay High Court has set aside a transfer pricing order proposing an adjustment...

Homebuyers Can’t Be Penalised for Developer’s “Past Sins”: Supreme Court Rejects NOIDA’s Time Extension Charges as CIRP Costs

In a significant ruling protecting homebuyers affected by prolonged insolvency proceedings, the Supreme Court...