Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAFormer Additional Director Can’t Be Held Liable for Company’s Later Violations: Karnataka...

Former Additional Director Can’t Be Held Liable for Company’s Later Violations: Karnataka HC Quashes DGFT Order

Company & PMLA

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Karnataka HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an order passed by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) authorities against a former Additional Director of a company, holding that a person who had resigned years earlier cannot be held responsible for alleged violations committed by the company subsequently. The bench of Justice M.G.S. Kamal has observed…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Second E-Way Bill Alone Doesn’t Prove Another Supply: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Raipur, has held...
GST

Whether GST Credit On Advertising, Business Promotion And Travel Expenses Is Blocked Raises Question Of Law? GSTAT Division Bench To Hear Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...
Notification

EPF Withdrawal Before Five Years: Form 121 Replaces Forms 15G and 15H for TDS Relief

Employees seeking relief from tax deducted at source (TDS) on eligible Employees’ Provident Fund...
GST

Rs. 1.41 Crore IGST Refund Appeals Must Be Heard by Two-Member Bench as Retrospective Amendment Raises Legal Question: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has directed that eleven...

More like this

GST

Second E-Way Bill Alone Doesn’t Prove Another Supply: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Raipur, has held...
GST

Whether GST Credit On Advertising, Business Promotion And Travel Expenses Is Blocked Raises Question Of Law? GSTAT Division Bench To Hear Appeal

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...
Notification

EPF Withdrawal Before Five Years: Form 121 Replaces Forms 15G and 15H for TDS Relief

Employees seeking relief from tax deducted at source (TDS) on eligible Employees’ Provident Fund...