Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeDirect TaxLack of Reasoned Order on FTS Classification Invalidates 10% Tax Withholding; Delhi...

Lack of Reasoned Order on FTS Classification Invalidates 10% Tax Withholding; Delhi High Court Cuts Rate to 2%

Direct Tax

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
delhi high court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has ruled that a tax withholding certificate issued without adequate reasoning on whether payments qualify as “Fees for Technical Services” (FTS) cannot be sustained, directing authorities to reduce the deduction rate from 10% to 2%. The Bench of  Justice Dinesh Mehta and Justice Vinod Kumar observed that the Competent Authority did…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 23.17 Crore Customs Duty Demand on Toyota

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Used Railway Rails Can’t Be Taxed as Track Material Without Proof They Are Fit for Reuse: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Paid Twice Can’t Be Retained Because First Payment Was Missing From ST-3 Return: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Cab Service for SEZ Staff Can’t Be Denied Tax Exemption Citing Part of Journey Is Outside SEZ: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

CESTAT Quashes Rs. 23.17 Crore Customs Duty Demand on Toyota

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Used Railway Rails Can’t Be Taxed as Track Material Without Proof They Are Fit for Reuse: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...
Indirect Taxes

Service Tax Paid Twice Can’t Be Retained Because First Payment Was Missing From ST-3 Return: CESTAT

The Chennai Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has...