HomeCompany & PMLAED Attaches Properties Worth Rs. 27.83 Crore in FEMA Probe Linked to...

ED Attaches Properties Worth Rs. 27.83 Crore in FEMA Probe Linked to Dubai Investments via Hawala

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) has provisionally seized immovable properties in Dubai worth approximately Rs. 27.83 crore in India in connection with an alleged violation of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), 1999, involving undisclosed overseas investments routed through hawala channels.

According to an official press release issued on February 4, 2026, the ED conducted searches at multiple premises in Delhi based on intelligence inputs indicating that certain high-net-worth individuals, while being persons resident in India, had made substantial overseas investments, primarily in Dubai, without routing funds through authorised banking channels.

Undisclosed Overseas Assets Detected

The searches led to the recovery of incriminating documents and information relating to undisclosed foreign assets acquired in contravention of FEMA provisions.

During the investigation, the ED found that Kapil Aggarwal and Smt. Sangeeta Aggarwal, both residents of India, had jointly acquired ten immovable properties in Dubai for a total consideration of AED 1,94,03,975, equivalent to approximately ₹34.14 crore. The agency noted that no corresponding outward remittance from India through authorised banking channels could be established.

The individuals also failed to furnish documentary evidence regarding the source of funds used for acquiring the overseas properties and could not produce any approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) for acquisition of foreign assets abroad, as required under FEMA regulations.

Separate Case Involving Additional Overseas Properties

In a separate but similar instance, the investigation revealed that S. Bhattacharya, also a person resident in India, had acquired two immovable properties overseas valued at AED 40,07,319, approximately ₹9.83 crore. The ED stated that no authorised outward remittance was traceable in this case either.

The individual allegedly failed to provide documentary proof of the source of overseas funds or RBI approval for acquisition of foreign immovable properties.

Seizure Ordered Under Section 37A of FEMA

Since the foreign properties were located outside India and could not be seized directly, the Competent Authority, exercising powers under Section 37A of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999, ordered the seizure of immovable properties situated in India as equivalent-value assets.

Accordingly, seizure orders were issued for:

  • Five immovable properties linked to Kapil Aggarwal and Smt. Sangeeta Aggarwal, valued at approximately ₹17.83 crore, and
  • Three immovable properties linked to S. Bhattacharya, held through NEC Energy Pvt. Ltd., valued at approximately ₹10 crore.

Investigation Ongoing

The Enforcement Directorate has stated that further investigation is under progress to identify additional assets, fund trails, and possible contraventions under FEMA.

Read More: Buying Dubai Properties Through Cash or Hawala Is a Serious FEMA Violation: What Recent ED Seizures Mean for Indians?

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

AO Can’t Reject DCF Share Valuation and Substitute NAV Method for Section 56(2)(viib) Addition: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Marriage Gifts and Household Cash Retention Can’t Be Rejected on Mere Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that cash...

ITAT Restores Dawoodi Bohra Jamat’s 12AB Registration Matter

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an...

Donation to Political Party Was Part of Accommodation Entry Scheme: ITAT Upholds Denial of S. 80GGC Deduction

The Ahmedabad Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has upheld the disallowance...

More like this

AO Can’t Reject DCF Share Valuation and Substitute NAV Method for Section 56(2)(viib) Addition: ITAT

The Delhi Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that an...

Marriage Gifts and Household Cash Retention Can’t Be Rejected on Mere Suspicion: ITAT Deletes Demonetisation Addition

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that cash...

ITAT Restores Dawoodi Bohra Jamat’s 12AB Registration Matter

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has set aside an...