Debatable MAT Loss Adjustment Can’t Be Rectified U/s 154: ITAT Quashes Rs. 40.68 Crore Demand Against Fiat India

HomeDirect TaxDebatable MAT Loss Adjustment Can’t Be Rectified U/s 154: ITAT Quashes Rs....

Debatable MAT Loss Adjustment Can’t Be Rectified U/s 154: ITAT Quashes Rs. 40.68 Crore Demand Against Fiat India

Direct Tax

Published on

03/02/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Debatable MAT Loss Adjustment Can’t Be Rectified U/s 154: ITAT Quashes Rs. 40.68 Crore Demand Against Fiat India

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed a Rs. 40.68 crore tax demand raised against Fiat India Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., holding that adjustments relating to brought-forward losses and unabsorbed depreciation while computing book profits under Section 115JB (MAT provisions) involve debatable issues and cannot be reopened through rectification proceedings under…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
MAT Loss Adjustment

Debatable MAT Loss Adjustment Can’t Be Rectified U/s 154: ITAT Quashes Rs. 40.68 Crore Demand Against Fiat India

Membership Required

Latest articles

ITAT Deletes Rs. 5.02 Crore Royalty Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Rejects Unexecuted Franchise Templates as CUP Comparables

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe Into Chhattisgarh Custodial Death, Directs Rs. 25 Lakh Interim Compensation

Money Recovery Suit Barred by Limitation, Clarifies Winding-Up Proceedings Do Not Extend Limitation: Supreme Court

Composite Appeal Maintainable Where 2 Suits by Same Plaintiff Are Tried Together and Decided by Common Judgment: Supreme Court

More like this

ITAT Deletes Rs. 5.02 Crore Royalty Transfer Pricing Adjustment, Rejects Unexecuted Franchise Templates as CUP Comparables

Supreme Court Orders CBI Probe Into Chhattisgarh Custodial Death, Directs Rs. 25 Lakh Interim Compensation

Money Recovery Suit Barred by Limitation, Clarifies Winding-Up Proceedings Do Not Extend Limitation: Supreme Court

About us

Company

Categories