Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesRs. 1.57-Crore Customs Demand on Cancer Therapy Equipment Quashed Citing Time-Barred Notice:...

Rs. 1.57-Crore Customs Demand on Cancer Therapy Equipment Quashed Citing Time-Barred Notice: CESTAT

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Rs. 1.57-Crore Customs Demand on Cancer Therapy Equipment Quashed Citing Time-Barred Notice: CESTAT

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai has set aside a customs duty demand of Rs. 1.57 crore raised against a Hospital in connection with the import of a “TrueBeam” Linear Accelerator system used for cancer treatment.  The bench of Ajayan T.V. (Judicial Member) and M. Ajit Kumar (Technical Member) held that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Indirect Taxes

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...
Direct Tax

Actuarially Determined Provision for Credit Guarantee Claims Is Allowable Deduction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...
Direct Tax

CBDT’s Revised Rs. 2 Crore Tax-Appeal Limit Applies to Pending Cases; Later Exceptions Can’t Operate Retrospectively: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has disposed of an Income Tax Department appeal involving a...
Direct Tax

Reassessment Beyond 3 Years Requires PCCIT Sanction: ITAT Quashes Notice Approved by CIT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed reassessment proceedings...

More like this

Indirect Taxes

Dept. Can’t Apply Different Yardsticks in Identical Tax Cases: Bombay HC Quashes Rs. 21.92 Crore Service Tax Demand

The Bombay High Court has dismissed a departmental appeal challenging the setting aside of...
Direct Tax

Actuarially Determined Provision for Credit Guarantee Claims Is Allowable Deduction: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that a...
Direct Tax

CBDT’s Revised Rs. 2 Crore Tax-Appeal Limit Applies to Pending Cases; Later Exceptions Can’t Operate Retrospectively: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has disposed of an Income Tax Department appeal involving a...