Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeCompany & PMLAPMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply:...

PMLA Provisional Attachment Lapses After 180 Days; COVID Limitation Orders Don’t Apply: Bombay HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Bombay High Court has held that a provisional attachment order (PAO) issued under Section 5 of the  Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) automatically ceases to have effect after 180 days, and that the Supreme Court’s COVID-era limitation extensions do not apply to such statutory timelines. The Bench of Justice M.S. Sonak and…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Fresh GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Required When Earlier Payment Covers Reduced Tax Demand: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...

Business Transfer Without Payment Is a GST Supply; Exemption Depends on Proof of Going Concern: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that the transfer of...

Tax Reopening Over Alleged ₹9.75 Crore Cash Loans Quashed for Bypassing S. 153C: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has quashed income-tax reassessment proceedings concerning alleged unaccounted cash loans...

Demonetised Cash Deposits Alone Can’t Be Treated As Unexplained Income: CIT(A)

The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), through the National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi,...

More like this

No Fresh GST Appeal Pre-Deposit Required When Earlier Payment Covers Reduced Tax Demand: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chennai Bench, has held that a...

Business Transfer Without Payment Is a GST Supply; Exemption Depends on Proof of Going Concern: AAR

The West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has held that the transfer of...

Tax Reopening Over Alleged ₹9.75 Crore Cash Loans Quashed for Bypassing S. 153C: Bombay HC

The Bombay High Court has quashed income-tax reassessment proceedings concerning alleged unaccounted cash loans...