Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTMaintain Records or Face Consequences: Madras HC Cautions Assessees Against Inconsistent Defences...

Maintain Records or Face Consequences: Madras HC Cautions Assessees Against Inconsistent Defences Under GST

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

In a stern caution to GST assessees, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has ruled that while tax authorities may be restrained from adopting impermissible methods of assessment, assessees cannot take inconsistent or contradictory stands to escape statutory obligations, particularly those relating to maintenance of accounts under the GST law. The bench of…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...

GSTAT Denies 0.1% Export Concession For Drums Sent To Distilleries, Grants Partial Relief From S. 74

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh, has held that HDPE drums...

GSTAT Upholds Multi-Year GST Notices, Rejects S. 74 For Disclosed ITC Mismatch And Freight Liability

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has upheld the validity...

GST Export Refund Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Goods Were Shipped After Claim Period: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh, has held that export invoices...

More like this

Exempt Cattle Feed Sales Alone Doesn’t Warrant ITC Reversal; Common Credit Must Be Verified: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh State Bench, has held that...

GSTAT Denies 0.1% Export Concession For Drums Sent To Distilleries, Grants Partial Relief From S. 74

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh, has held that HDPE drums...

GSTAT Upholds Multi-Year GST Notices, Rejects S. 74 For Disclosed ITC Mismatch And Freight Liability

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has upheld the validity...