Accused Not Entitled to Discretion in Serious Economic Offences: Rajasthan HC Denies Bail in Rs. 706 Crore GST Evasion Case

HomeGSTAccused Not Entitled to Discretion in Serious Economic Offences: Rajasthan HC Denies...

Accused Not Entitled to Discretion in Serious Economic Offences: Rajasthan HC Denies Bail in Rs. 706 Crore GST Evasion Case

GST

Published on

19/01/2026

By Mariya Paliwala

Accused Not Entitled to Discretion in Serious Economic Offences: Rajasthan HC Denies Bail in Rs. 706 Crore GST Evasion Case

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Rajasthan High Court has refused to grant bail to Manoj Vijay, an accused in a high-value Goods and Services Tax (GST) evasion case, holding that the gravity of the alleged economic offence and the conduct of the accused disentitle him from discretionary relief at this stage. The bench of Justice Vinod Kumar Bharwani has…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Economic Offences

Accused Not Entitled to Discretion in Serious Economic Offences: Rajasthan HC Denies Bail in Rs. 706 Crore GST Evasion Case

Membership Required

Latest articles

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Input Services Are Availed Outside Factory Premises: CESTAT

Can GST Prosecution Continue After Tax Demand Falls Below Rs. 5 Crore? Uttarakhand HC Defers Decision

Listed Company Assets Can’t Be Used to Secure Promoters’ Loans: SEBI Imposes Rs. 14.8 Million Penalty On Zee Entertainment

Separate GST Proceedings for Different FY Not Barred U/s 6(2)(b): Supreme Court

More like this

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied Merely Because Input Services Are Availed Outside Factory Premises: CESTAT

Can GST Prosecution Continue After Tax Demand Falls Below Rs. 5 Crore? Uttarakhand HC Defers Decision

Listed Company Assets Can’t Be Used to Secure Promoters’ Loans: SEBI Imposes Rs. 14.8 Million Penalty On Zee Entertainment

About us

Company

Categories