Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesNo Unjust Enrichment If Duty Was Not Recovered from Buyers: CESTAT Allows...

No Unjust Enrichment If Duty Was Not Recovered from Buyers: CESTAT Allows Refund to Importer

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
No Unjust Enrichment If Duty Was Not Recovered from Buyers: CESTAT Allows Refund to Importer

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the refund claim of the importer and held that no unjust enrichment if duty was not recovered from buyers. The bench of Dr. Rachna Gupta (Judicial Member) has observed that the customs duty paid by the importer during investigation was…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

GST Registration Can’t Be Cancelled On Vague ITC Allegations Or Oral Intimation: GSTAT Restores Registration

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Lucknow, has restored...
GST

GSTAT May Refuse Appeals Involving Up To Rs. 50K: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Lucknow, has refused...
GST

Excess Stock Estimated By Eye Can’t Justify GST Confiscation: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has held that an...
Indirect Taxes

Customs Can’t Retain Seized Cash Without Timely Notice Or Valid Extension: Supreme Court Leaves Rs. 1 Lakh Costs Against DRI Intact

The Supreme Court has dismissed the Customs authorities’ challenge to an Allahabad High Court...

More like this

GST

GST Registration Can’t Be Cancelled On Vague ITC Allegations Or Oral Intimation: GSTAT Restores Registration

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Lucknow, has restored...
GST

GSTAT May Refuse Appeals Involving Up To Rs. 50K: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Lucknow, has refused...
GST

Excess Stock Estimated By Eye Can’t Justify GST Confiscation: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has held that an...