Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesExcise Duty Demand on Dietary Supplements Upheld; CESTAT Denies Area-Based Exemption

Excise Duty Demand on Dietary Supplements Upheld; CESTAT Denies Area-Based Exemption

Indirect Taxes

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
Excise Duty Demand on Dietary Supplements Upheld; CESTAT Denies Area-Based Exemption

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The New Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has upheld a substantial excise duty demand and ruled that dietary supplements cannot be classified as pharmaceutical products and are therefore not eligible for area-based excise exemption under Notification No. 49/2003-CE. The bench of Binu Tamta (Judicial  Member) and P.V. Subba…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST

Invoices, E-Way Bills Not Enough When Goods Don’t Match Records: GSTAT Restores ₹47.11 Lakh Tax And Penalty

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow State Bench, has restored a...
GST

GST Penalty Can’t Rest Solely On Driver’s Claim Of Undeclared Loading Point: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow, has dismissed a departmental appeal...
GST

Excess Goods Can’t Justify GST Penalty On Entire Consignment Without Further Evidence: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has held that detection...
GST

Areca Nut Case | Fake ITC And False Records Attract GST Penalties Despite Dropped Tax Demand: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru, has restored penalties against an...

More like this

GST

Invoices, E-Way Bills Not Enough When Goods Don’t Match Records: GSTAT Restores ₹47.11 Lakh Tax And Penalty

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow State Bench, has restored a...
GST

GST Penalty Can’t Rest Solely On Driver’s Claim Of Undeclared Loading Point: GSTAT 

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow, has dismissed a departmental appeal...
GST

Excess Goods Can’t Justify GST Penalty On Entire Consignment Without Further Evidence: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Lucknow Bench, has held that detection...