GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka High Court

HomeGSTGST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka...

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka High Court

GST Top Stories

Published on

16/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Karnataka High Court has set aside a GST appellate order against an education services company and directed the tax authorities to sanction a refund of over ₹3.91 crore along with applicable interest, holding that the services rendered by the company do not qualify as those of an “intermediary” under the GST law. The bench…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

GST Refund Can’t Be Denied by Treating Export Services as ‘Intermediary’: Karnataka High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Personal Inspection & Agriculture Dept. Input Not Enough for Technical Micronutrient Classification: Karnataka High Court Faults Commissioner’s Approach

NFRA Can Debar Audit Firms for 10 Years, Impose Rs. 5 Crore Penalty

CENVAT Credit Use During Default Is Invalid: Calcutta High Court Upholds Cash Duty Demand U/R 8(3A), Allows Credit Restoration

Writ: A Virtue of Extraordinary Relief

More like this

Personal Inspection & Agriculture Dept. Input Not Enough for Technical Micronutrient Classification: Karnataka High Court Faults Commissioner’s Approach

NFRA Can Debar Audit Firms for 10 Years, Impose Rs. 5 Crore Penalty

CENVAT Credit Use During Default Is Invalid: Calcutta High Court Upholds Cash Duty Demand U/R 8(3A), Allows Credit Restoration

About us

Company

Categories