Income Tax Dept. To Refund Excess Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed Demand: Calcutta High Court

HomeDirect TaxIncome Tax Dept. To Refund Excess Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed Demand:...

Income Tax Dept. To Refund Excess Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed Demand: Calcutta High Court

Direct Tax Top Stories

Published on

06/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Income Tax Dept. To Refund Excess Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed Demand: Calcutta High Court

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has directed the Income Tax Department to refund all amounts recovered beyond 20% of the disputed tax demand. The bench of Justice Om Narayan Rai has observed that recovery of any amount exceeding 20% of the disputed demand through refund adjustment cannot be sustained while an appeal is pending. The dispute…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Refund Excess Recovery

Income Tax Dept. To Refund Excess Recovery Beyond 20% of Disputed Demand: Calcutta High Court

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories