GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

HomeGSTGST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated...

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

GST Top Stories

Published on

04/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Kerala High Court has held that the recovery proceedings can be initiated against the supplier, only if the proceedings initiated against the purchaser did not materialize. The bench of Justice Ziyad Rahman A.A. has observed that recovery proceedings would be justified against the purchaser, only in a case where the Department is able to…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
GST Recovery Proceedings

GST Recovery Proceedings Can Be Initiated Against Supplier, Only If Proceedings Initiated Against Purchaser Did Not Materialize: Kerala HC

Membership Required

Latest articles

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

Delhi High Court Quashes Rs. 96 Crore Reassessment Citing ‘Change of Opinion’, Limitation Bar

More like this

Lack of Reasoned Order by ICAI Board: Delhi HC Quashes Closure of Professional Misconduct Complaint

No Evidence of Pilferage Under Section 45 of Customs Act: CESTAT Quashes Duty Demand on CONCOR

Classification of EPS-ECU as Automobile Part Upholds; CESTAT Dismisses 196 Appeals by Mitsubishi Electric Automotive India

About us

Company

Categories