Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

Ask Jurishour AI

HomeIndirect TaxesValuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise...

Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

Indirect Taxes

Published on

02/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has quashed the excise duty demand raised on Ultratech Cement Ltd. pertaining to clearances of cement in 50 kg bags for captive consumption between May 2016 and June 2017. The bench of Justice Dilip Gupta (President) and Hemambika R. Priya (Technical Member) that clearances…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Ask Jurishour AI

Valuation of Captive-Use Cement Not Liable to MRP-Based Duty: CESTAT Quashes Excise Duty Demand on Ultratech Cement

Membership Required

Latest articles

Supreme Court Seeks Replies From 20 Rebel TMC MPs on Plea Against Delay in Disqualification Proceedings

10-Year Jail Term in Rape Case: Supreme Court Orders Tarun Tejpal to Surrender Within Two Weeks

Procedural Lapses Can’t Justify Harsh Punishment Without Serious Customs Breach: CESTAT Quashes Customs Broker Licence Revocation

Madras High Court Stays GST Recovery Notice Against Directors; Finds Prima Facie Case on Applicability of Section 79(1)(c)

More like this

Supreme Court Seeks Replies From 20 Rebel TMC MPs on Plea Against Delay in Disqualification Proceedings

10-Year Jail Term in Rape Case: Supreme Court Orders Tarun Tejpal to Surrender Within Two Weeks

Procedural Lapses Can’t Justify Harsh Punishment Without Serious Customs Breach: CESTAT Quashes Customs Broker Licence Revocation

About us

Company

Categories