“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

HomeOther Laws“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi...

“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

Other Laws

Published on

01/12/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Delhi High Court has upheld the late filing of ownership documents triggered by the defendant’s question and stated that “cross-examination is not what to ask, but what not to ask”. The bench of Justice Girish Kathpalia upheld the trial court’s order which had allowed the plaintiff to file a conveyance deed dated September 27,…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

“Cross-Examination is Not What to Ask, But What Not to Ask”: Delhi High Court Upholds Late Filing of Documents Triggered by Defendant’s Question

Membership Required

Latest articles

Can Commercial Vehicles Qualify for 50% Depreciation? Delhi ITAT Follows Consistent Precedent in Favour of Assessee

Madras High Court Remits GST Demand for Fresh Adjudication After Taxpayer Claims It Was Unaware of SCN Following Business Closure

AO Can’t Reject Recognised Valuation Method Merely Because It Was Not Yet Notified: Delhi High Court Upholds DCF Valuation of Shares

Interest on Delayed Duty Drawback Runs From 1 Month After ‘Let Export Order’, Not Final Adjudication: Delhi High Court

More like this

Can Commercial Vehicles Qualify for 50% Depreciation? Delhi ITAT Follows Consistent Precedent in Favour of Assessee

Madras High Court Remits GST Demand for Fresh Adjudication After Taxpayer Claims It Was Unaware of SCN Following Business Closure

AO Can’t Reject Recognised Valuation Method Merely Because It Was Not Yet Notified: Delhi High Court Upholds DCF Valuation of Shares

About us

Company

Categories