HomeGSTGST Dept. Wrongly Classified Stock, Premises Insurance Policy as Motor Vehicle Insurance;...

GST Dept. Wrongly Classified Stock, Premises Insurance Policy as Motor Vehicle Insurance; ITC Can’t Be Denied: Gujarat HC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat High Court has held that the GST Department wrongly classified stock, premises insurance policy as motor vehicle insurance, so the input tax credit (ITC) cannot be denied. The bench Justice Bhargav D. Karia and Justice Pranav Trivedi has set aside a demand order and bank attachment issued against Arraycom (India) Limited after finding…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand on Labour Contractor

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

Black Money Act Notice Issued Nearly 1 Year Late, Holds CBDT’s 30-Day Timeline Binding: ITAT

The Mumbai Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has quashed Black Money...

More like this

Company Must Be Made Accused Before Fastening Vicarious Liability Against Director In GST Prosecution: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab & Haryana High Court has held that a director cannot be prosecuted...

Coal Beneficiation Not Taxable as ‘Business Auxiliary Service’ Before June 1, 2007: CESTAT

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...

CESTAT Upholds Service Tax Demand on Labour Contractor

The Principal Bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New...