Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsSC Quashes Dacoity Charge After Finding No Intent to Steal and Full...

SC Quashes Dacoity Charge After Finding No Intent to Steal and Full Settlement Between Parties

Other Laws

Published on

By Mariya Paliwala
SC Quashes Dacoity Charge After Finding No Intent to Steal and Full Settlement Between Parties

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Supreme Court has ruled that prosecution for dacoity cannot continue when the allegations stemmed from a dispute over institutional documents — not from an intention to steal — and where all property was later returned pursuant to an amicable settlement. The Court therefore quashed the FIR in full against the accused in the Nandurbar…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here
Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 2, 2026.GSTCAN GST CONFISCATION PROCEEDINGS BE...
GST

Business Purpose Alone Can’t Secure GST Credit: GSTAT Upholds ITC Disallowance For Lack Of Evidence

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad Bench, has upheld the disallowance...
GST

Annual Return Errors Can’t Defeat ITC Protected By Retrospective S. 16(5): GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has set...
Supreme Court

Marriage Reaches ‘Dead End’: SC Grants Divorce Granted With ₹35 Lakh Alimony

The Supreme Court has dissolved a marriage by mutual consent under Article 142 of...

More like this

Case Compilation

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 2 OCTOBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for October 2, 2026.GSTCAN GST CONFISCATION PROCEEDINGS BE...
GST

Business Purpose Alone Can’t Secure GST Credit: GSTAT Upholds ITC Disallowance For Lack Of Evidence

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Ghaziabad Bench, has upheld the disallowance...
GST

Annual Return Errors Can’t Defeat ITC Protected By Retrospective S. 16(5): GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), State Bench at Ghaziabad, has set...