Calcutta High Court Denies Bail To Concast Steel MD Involved In Rs. 6,210-Crore Money Laundering Case

HomeCompany & PMLACalcutta High Court Denies Bail To Concast Steel MD Involved In Rs....

Calcutta High Court Denies Bail To Concast Steel MD Involved In Rs. 6,210-Crore Money Laundering Case

Company & PMLA

Published on

17/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Calcutta High Court Denies Bail To Concast Steel MD Involved In Rs. 6,210-Crore Money Laundering Case

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Calcutta High Court has refused to grant bail to industrialist Sanjay Surekha @ Sanjay Kumar Surekha, Chairman and Managing Director of Concast Steel and Power Limited, after concluding that his release could jeopardize the ongoing investigation into an alleged ₹6,210-crore financial fraud and money laundering network. The bench of Justice Suvra Ghosh held that…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Tags
Concast Steel

Calcutta High Court Denies Bail To Concast Steel MD Involved In Rs. 6,210-Crore Money Laundering Case

Membership Required

Latest articles

Composite Appeal Maintainable Where 2 Suits by Same Plaintiff Are Tried Together and Decided by Common Judgment: Supreme Court

Multi-Heading Use of Medical Laser Imagers Attracts Residuary Customs Classification Under CTH 9033 00 00: Supreme Court

Bank’s Suspense Account Interest Cannot Be Ignored: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 54.90 Lakh Loan Liability

Time-Barred Operational Debt Cannot Revive Through IBC: Supreme Court Quashes S. 9 Insolvency Proceedings

More like this

Composite Appeal Maintainable Where 2 Suits by Same Plaintiff Are Tried Together and Decided by Common Judgment: Supreme Court

Multi-Heading Use of Medical Laser Imagers Attracts Residuary Customs Classification Under CTH 9033 00 00: Supreme Court

Bank’s Suspense Account Interest Cannot Be Ignored: Supreme Court Restores Rs. 54.90 Lakh Loan Liability

About us

Company

Categories