Air India Held Liable for Wrongfully Offloading Passengers; Consumer Commission Orders Refund Plus Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation And Rs. 50K Litigation Costs

HomeOther LawsAir India Held Liable for Wrongfully Offloading Passengers; Consumer Commission Orders Refund...

Air India Held Liable for Wrongfully Offloading Passengers; Consumer Commission Orders Refund Plus Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation And Rs. 50K Litigation Costs

Other Laws

Published on

17/11/2025

By Mariya Paliwala

Air India Held Liable for Wrongfully Offloading Passengers; Consumer Commission Orders Refund Plus Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation And Rs. 50K Litigation Costs

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission-VI (New Delhi) has held Air India guilty of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for offloading two passengers despite their confirmed tickets, valid Schengen visas, immigration clearance, and issued boarding passes. The Bench of President Poonam Chaudhry and Members Bariq Ahmad and Shekhar Chandra directed Air India to…

Membership Required

You must be a member to access this content.

View Membership Levels

Already a member? Log in here

Mariya Paliwala https://www.jurishour.in/

Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Air India Held Liable for Wrongfully Offloading Passengers; Consumer Commission Orders Refund Plus Rs. 1 Lakh Compensation And Rs. 50K Litigation Costs

Membership Required

Latest articles

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

Bona Fide Mistakes Shouldn’t Defeat Substantive Tax Rights: Karnataka High Court Allows Correction of GST DRC-03 Filing Error

More like this

Delayed FIR Weakens Prosecution at Bail Stage, Bombay Court Grants Bail in Rs. 1.25 Crore Jewellery Dispute

Services Used for Setting Up Factory Continue to Qualify as ‘Input Services’: CESTAT

Customs Can’t Enhance Import Value Solely on NIDB Data Without Proof of Comparable Imports: CESTAT

About us

Company

Categories