Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeIndirect TaxesCAT Imposes Rs. 20K Cost on CBIC Chairman For Non-Appearance

CAT Imposes Rs. 20K Cost on CBIC Chairman For Non-Appearance [READ ORDER]

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Cuttack Bench, has imposed Rs. 20K cost on CBIC Chairman for non-appearance.

The case, titled Deepak Niranjan Nath Pandit vs Central Board of Indirect Taxes & Customs (CBIC), was heard by a Bench comprising Member (A) Pramod Kumar Das and Member (J) Sudhi Ranjan Mishra. The matter pertains to alleged non-compliance with the Tribunal’s earlier order dated September 12, 2025, which had directed the CBIC Chairman to either file a full compliance report or obtain a stay order from the High Court.

During the hearing, Tushar Ranjan Mohanty, counsel for the applicant, submitted that despite clear directions, the  CBIC Chairman failed to comply with the Tribunal’s order or to appear before the Bench as directed. The Tribunal had specifically instructed that  CBIC Chairman should remain personally present if no stay or compliance report was filed.

On behalf of the respondents, A.C. Deo, counsel for CBIC, informed the Tribunal that an MA had been filed seeking dispensation of personal appearance for  CBIC Chairman, stating that the department’s writ petition before the High Court has been listed for hearing on October 29, 2025.

However, the Tribunal took a serious view of the non-compliance, observing that “the action of the respondents in not doing so is not appreciated.” It reiterated that either a full compliance report or a stay order from the High Court must be placed on record.

Taking into account the prayer of the respondents’ counsel, the Tribunal refrained from issuing a coercive order but imposed a cost of Rs. 20,000 on CBIC Chairman to be paid to the applicant before the next date of hearing.

The Bench further directed the respondents to file the full compliance report or stay order, if any, by the next date, failing which the CBIC Chairman must remain personally present before the Tribunal on December 11, 2025, at 10:30 a.m.

Case Details

Case Title: Deepak Niranjan Nath Pandit Vs Central Board Of Indirect Taxes &Amp; Customs (CBIC)

Date: 23/10/2025

Read More: Supreme Court Protects Client-Advocate Privilege Communication: Summons to Lawyers Under BNSS Must Meet Strict Conditions

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...

Govt. Funding Doesn’t Establish Eligibility For 12% GST On Spinning Mill Construction: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Pune Bench, has upheld 18% GST...

More like this

FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 – SRI SUJIT DAS AND ORS. ETC. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA

This Article pertaining to FREEDOM SUPREME – 2026 INSC 1195 - SRI SUJIT DAS...

GST Notice Despite Advance Ruling: Gujarat High Court Restrains Final Order Without Its Permission

The Gujarat High Court has granted ad-interim protection to a company challenging proceedings under...

GST Demand Based On Return Scrutiny Requires Prior ASMT-10 Notice: Gauhati High Court

The Gauhati High Court has set aside a GST demand proceeding involving alleged under-declaration...