Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTChhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To Person Accused Of Wrongfully Availing ITC

Chhattisgarh HC Grants Bail To Person Accused Of Wrongfully Availing ITC

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Chhattisgarh High Court has granted the bail to Ankit Singh, a person accused of wrongfully availing Input Tax Credit (ITC) worth Rs.23.06 crores from non-existent, registration-cancelled, or suspected business entities.

The bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha has observed that the complaint has already been filed against the applicant and further no statutory notice or assessment has been conducted against the applicant under the SGST Act, 2017, the quantum of tax involved remains unassessed and appealable, and the applicant has fully cooperated with the investigation and further the complaint has been filed, it appears that no purpose would be served by his further detention. The primary object of the Act is economic recovery rather than punitive incarceration.

The applicant is the Director of M/s Mahavir Moulds India Private Limited and is allegedly involved in the management, operations, and financial transactions of the following seven companies, namely—M/s Jai Bajrang Loha Private Limited, M/s Shree Pashupati Nath Loha & Steel Traders Private Limited, M/s Ambitious Procon Private Limited, M/s Karma Hireup Private Limited, M/s Morvi Nandan Healthcare Private Limited, M/s Nairson Multiventures Private Limited, and M/s NPR Commercials Private Limited. 

It was alleged that these entities have claimed and availed ineligible or fake Input Tax Credit (ITC) amounting to approximately Rs.23.06 crores from non-existent, registration-cancelled, or suspected business entities. 

The complaint, as filed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (BIU), New Raipur Division, discloses that the alleged acts of the applicant constitute offences punishable under Section 132(1)(b) and (c) of the Chhattisgarh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, which are further punishable under Section 132(1)(i) of the GST Act.

The court while noting that applicant is languishing in jail since 20.08.2025, his custodial detention is not warranted hence, without commenting anything on merits of the case, granted regular bail to the applicant subject to furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with one solvent surety to the satisfaction of the concerned Court.

Case Details

Case Title: Ankit Singh Versus State Of Chhattisgarh 

Case No.: MCRC No. 8411 of 2025

Date: 17.10.2025

Counsel For Petitioner: Manoj Paranjpe, Sr. Adv

Counsel For Respondent: S.S. Baghel, Dy. G.A.

Read More: Delhi HC Quashes Customs Demand After DGFT Confirms Export Obligation Fulfilment Under Advance Authorisation

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...

Why do GST Dept. Recover ITC From Buyers When Suppliers Fail to Deposit Tax?

A purchaser may hold a valid tax invoice, receive the goods or services, pay...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 7 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 7, 2026.GST57TH GST COUNCIL MEETING POSTPONED...

Appeal Filing Enabled For Cases Involving NIL or Zero Demand Amount: GSTN 

The Goods and Service Tax Network (GSTN) has enabled the filing of appeal for...

Supreme Court Upholds Quashing of Rs. 363 Crore GST Demand Against Vodafone

The Supreme Court has refused to interfere with a Bombay High Court judgment quashing...