Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTAllahabad High Court Stays GST Demand on Mining Royalty

Allahabad High Court Stays GST Demand on Mining Royalty

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Allahabad High Court, Lucknow Bench, has stayed the demand of Goods and Services Tax (GST) on royalty payments made by miners, pending the outcome of related proceedings before the Supreme Court and another writ petition pending before the High Court.

The Division Bench comprising Justice Shekhar B. Saraf and Justice Prashant Kumar heard the counsel for the petitioner, Mudit Agarwal, submitted that the question of whether GST is payable on mining royalty is already under consideration before the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 37326 of 2017, where the apex court has granted a stay on payment of GST on royalty.

The Bench noted that the same issue is also being examined by the Allahabad High Court in Writ Tax No. 823 of 2025and directed that the present petition be listed along with that case.

In the interim, the Court granted relief to the petitioner by staying the GST demand for the tax periods 2018–19, 2019–20, 2020–21, 2021–22, and 2022–23, relying on the reasons recorded in an earlier leading case—Writ Tax No. 475 of 2021at Allahabad, where similar interim protection had been granted.

The Court’s direction provides temporary respite to the mining leaseholders who have been facing GST demands on royalty payments, a contentious issue that continues to be litigated at multiple judicial levels.

Case Title: Gopal Pandey v. State of U.P. & Others
Case No.: Writ Tax No. 1053 of 2025
Date: 07/10/2025
Counsel for Petitioner: Mudit Agarwal
Counsel for Respondents: C.S.C., K.D. Nag

Read More: DGCA Approved Flight Training Courses Exempt From GST: Allahabad High Court Directs AAR To Reconsider

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...

GST Order Passed Without Hearing Quashed: Madras High Court 

The Madras High Court has set aside a GST assessment order passed under Section...

More like this

No GST on Assignment of GIDC Leasehold Rights: Gujarat High Court Orders Refund of ITC Reversal With Interest

The Gujarat High Court has held that the assignment of leasehold rights in an...

NCLT Can’t Involve ED or CBI in Company Investigation Without Hearing Affected Parties: NCLAT

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has held that the National Company Law...

Personal Customs Penalty Proceedings Against Company Director Abate After His Death: Bombay High Court

The Bombay High Court has declared that customs penalty proceedings initiated against a company...