Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeNotificationExports Of Frozen Meat Products Will Now Require Proof of Remittance to...

Exports Of Frozen Meat Products Will Now Require Proof of Remittance to MEDF: DGFT

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Directorate General of Foreign Trade has notified that the exports of chilled and frozen meat products  will now require proof of remittance to the Meat Export Development Fund (MEDF) from 29 October 2025.

The DGFT has notified the amendment in export policy of meat and meat products.

The government has mandated that, “The export of chilled/frozen meat shall be permitted subject to submission of proof of remittance to the Meat Export Development Fund (MEDF), operated by APEDA.”

This means that exporters must now submit evidence that they have deposited the required remittance into the MEDF before export clearance is granted.

The condition applies specifically to the following HS Codes under the category of meat of bovine animals and edible offal:

0201 – Meat of Bovine Animals, Fresh and Chilled

  • 02013000 – Boneless

0202 – Meat of Bovine Animals, Frozen

  • 02023000 – Boneless

0206 – Edible Offal of Bovine Animals, Fresh, Chilled or Frozen

  • 02061000 – Of bovine animals, fresh or chilled
  • 02062100 – Of bovine animals, frozen – Tongues
  • 02062200 – Of bovine animals, frozen – Livers
  • 02062900 – Of bovine animals, frozen – Other

For each of these items, exports will now also be subject to the newly added Export Policy Condition 9 of the Chapter.

To allow time for transition, the new policy will come into effect from 29 October 2025.

Notification Details

Notification No. 42/2025-26

Date: 14/10/2025

Read More: FHRAI Urges FinM to Rationalise GST On Hotel Room Tariffs

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...

Loan Recovery Can’t Become “Instrument of Oppression”: Supreme Court Awards Rs.10 Lakh Compensation for Midnight Repossession of Truck

The Supreme Court has strongly deprecated the forcible repossession of a borrower’s truck by...

More like this

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 16 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for  September 16, 2026.GSTGST REVOCATION ORDER QUASHED AFTER...

CBIC Circulars Not Binding On GSTAT; Inverted Duty Refund Available Where Inputs And Finished Goods Are Distinct: GSTAT

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Kolkata Bench, has upheld a refund...

Money Received by Intermediary Not Enough to Prove Public Servant Accepted Bribe: Supreme Court Acquits RPF Officer

The Supreme Court has acquitted a former Divisional Security Commissioner of the Railway Protection...