Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGSTKnow Changes In Table 6 of GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25

Know Changes In Table 6 of GSTR-9 for FY 2024–25

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The government has introduced an important change in Table 6 of GSTR-9 for the financial year 2024–25.

Taxpayers can now report Input Tax Credit (ITC) pertaining to the previous financial year but claimed in the current year’s GSTR-3B in a specific and distinct column.

Until now, taxpayers faced ambiguity while reporting such ITC adjustments. The GSTR-9 format did not contain a separate field to declare ITC of the preceding financial year that was availed in the subsequent year’s returns. As a result, many taxpayers had to report such ITC either as a negative figure in Table 6B or under the “Others” category (Table 6M) — leading to non-uniform reporting across different filers and potential mismatches during reconciliation and audits.

For FY 2024–25, Table 6 has been revised to include a dedicated column for ITC of the previous financial year claimed in the current year’s GSTR-3B. 

Read More: Income Tax Dept. Seizes 10 kg Gold, Rs. 1 Crore Cash After Marathon Raids on Go Fashion India in Chennai and Bengaluru

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

No Service Tax On Transfer of Development Rights: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has ruled that...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Supplementary Invoices in Absence of Fraud or Suppression: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...

GST Appeal Filed Within 3 Months After Excluding Order Date Can’t Be Rejected as Delayed: Madras High Court

The Madras High Court has restored a GST appeal that was rejected solely on...

More like this

No Service Tax On Transfer of Development Rights: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has ruled that...

CENVAT Credit Can’t Be Denied on Supplementary Invoices in Absence of Fraud or Suppression: CESTAT

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), New Delhi, has set aside...

GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B Mismatch Alone Can’t Prove Wrongful ITC Availment: GSTAT Quashes Demand Beyond SCN

The Goods and Services Tax Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT), Bengaluru Bench, has held that a...