Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeOther LawsP&H HC Warns Lawyers Against Using AI To Answer Court Queries

P&H HC Warns Lawyers Against Using AI To Answer Court Queries

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has issued a stern warning to advocates over the increasing use of mobile phones and artificial intelligence (AI) tools during court proceedings, cautioning that such conduct hampers the decorum and smooth functioning of hearings.

The bench of Justice Sanjay Vashisth observed that several advocates were relying on mobile devices to search for information or use AI-based tools in real time to answer court queries. The judge expressed displeasure that proceedings were being stalled as lawyers paused to look up details instead of being fully prepared in advance.

“This Court is concerned and bothered time and again by respective members of the Bar using mobile phones during the course of hearing, just in front of the Court. Even sometimes, proceedings are to be stalled, awaiting the answer,” Justice Vashisth remarked in his order.

The judge recalled that a similar incident had occurred earlier in Ravneet Singh Sandhu @ Manveer Singh v. UT of Chandigarh (CRM-M-50544-2025), heard on September 19, 2025, where a mobile phone was seized during proceedings. Following that episode, the information was shared with the High Court Bar Association to alert members against such practices.

Expressing concern over the recurrence of the issue, the Court directed that a copy of the latest order be sent to the President and Secretary of the High Court Bar Association. They have been asked to apprise members not to compel the Court to pass “any harsh order” due to the continued use of mobile phones or AI platforms during hearings.

“Bar members must not compel the Court to act harshly on account of repeated use of mobile phones during hearing to update themselves through artificial intelligence or online platforms,” the order emphasized.

The matter has been listed for further hearing on November 20, 2025.

Case Details

Case Title: RXXXXXX v. State of Haryana 

Case No.: CRM-M-31392-2025

Date: September 30, 2025

Counsel For  Petitioner: Sandeep Verma, Advocate

Counsel For Respondent: Amish Sharma, AAG, Haryana

Read More: Central Government Hikes Dearness Allowance to 58% from July 2025

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

Service Tax Refund on Cancelled Flat Booking Cannot Be Rejected as Time-Barred: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of  Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 24, 2026.GSTNO 10% GST PENALTY PRE-DEPOSIT...

Training Call Letter Is Not Appointment Order: Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Railway Protection Special Force Rakshak

The Supreme Court has held that a letter calling a selected candidate for mandatory...

Sessions Court Can’t Bar Remission for Entire Life in Murder Case: Supreme Court 

The Supreme Court has held that a Sessions Court sentencing a person for murder...

More like this

Service Tax Refund on Cancelled Flat Booking Cannot Be Rejected as Time-Barred: CESTAT

The Mumbai Bench of  Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held...

JURISHOUR | TAX LAW DAILY BULLETIN : 24 SEPTEMBER, 2026

Here’s the Tax Law Daily Bulletin for September 24, 2026.GSTNO 10% GST PENALTY PRE-DEPOSIT...

Training Call Letter Is Not Appointment Order: Supreme Court Upholds Removal of Railway Protection Special Force Rakshak

The Supreme Court has held that a letter calling a selected candidate for mandatory...