Ask Jurishour AI

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
tdb_templates
saswp_reviews
saswp-collections
saswp_rvs_location
tdc-review-email
web-story-font
web-story
googlesitekit_email
tds_locker
tds_email
saswp
mailpoet_page
mailpoet_email
tdcpt_tunes
tdc-review
pronamic_payment
pronamic_gateway
pronamic_pay_subscr
wpcode
HomeGST18% GST On Rapigro, A Plant Growth Regulator: AAAR

18% GST On Rapigro, A Plant Growth Regulator: AAAR

Published on

🚀 Stay Connected With JurisHour

WhatsApp X Telegram

The Gujarat Appellate Authority of Advance Ruling (AAAR) has held that 18% GST is payable on Rapigro, which is a plant growth regulator.

The bench of Sunil Kumar Mall and Rajeev Topno while upholding the AAR’s ruling observed that the classification of Rapigro under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and under the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 will be under 38089340, as a ‘plant growth regulator.

The appellant, Jivagro Limited is engaged in manufacture, import, export, wholesale, retail sale and distribution of Agro Chemicals, Bio-Control, Agri-Inputs and Bio-Stimulants, including Rapigro Liquid as well as Rapigro Granules.

The appellant sought the advance ruling in respect of the classification of Rapigro under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975; classification of Rapigro under the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017; and Rate of tax payable on Rapigro.

The AAR held that 18% GST is payable on Rapigro after going through the analytical composition provided by the applicant there is no mention or inclusion of secondary or micro nutrients, for the product to fall under fertilizers; further, the analytical composition does not lead to the conclusion that Nitrogen, Phosphorus or Potassium is the constituent giving essential character to the product Rapigro.

The appellant challenged the AAR’s order on the ground that for classification of the product as PGR under 3808, in terms of note 1(a)(2), of chapter 38, the product should be separately defined chemical element or compound & should be put up in forms or packaging for retails sale or as preparations or articles; that in case of Rapigro it is not a separately defined chemical element or compound & hence the same cannot be covered under chapter 38.

The AAR ruled that the appellant has not produced anything to warrant any interference with the findings of the ruling.

Ruling Details

Applicant’s Name: M/s. Jivagro Limited

Ruling Date: 2209.2025

Read More: ITC Admissible On Electrical Equipment Installed Outside Factory Premises, GST Dept’s Appeal Rejected: AAAR

Mariya Paliwala
Mariya Paliwalahttps://www.jurishour.in/
Mariya is the Senior Editor at Juris Hour. She has 7+ years of experience on covering tax litigation stories from the Supreme Court, High Courts and various tribunals including CESTAT, ITAT, NCLAT, NCLT, etc. Mariya graduated from MLSU Law College, Udaipur (Raj.) with B.A.LL.B. and also holds an LL.M. She started her career as a freelance tax reporter in the leading online legal news companies.

Latest articles

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...

Can Foreign Assets Be Assessed for AY 2018–19 When the First Black Money Act Notice Was Issued in FY 2018–19? Karnataka High Court Says...

The Karnataka High Court has quashed an assessment concerning two properties in Morocco after...

More like this

GST Demand on Money Transfer Services: Delhi High Court Sends Export and S. 74 Disputes to Appellate Authority

The Delhi High Court has directed the assessee to pursue its statutory appeal against...

GST Refund Rejection Quashed After Revised Notice Returned Undelivered: Gujarat High Court

The Gujarat High Court has set aside the rejection of a ₹3.83 lakh GST...

Customs Can’t Insist on Form-I for India–UK CETA Tariff Claims Supported by Valid Origin Declaration: CBIC

The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) has clarified that an importer...